Independent and not affiliated with the FDA, MHRA, ISPE, PDA, or any agency. Get the appgoutham@madhadi.com
madhadi.comData Integrity & GxP Quality
Browse all topics → Articles Templates & Procedures Learning paths GlossaryScenariosToolsRegulatory ReferencesLearning PathsTopics About Start here
Checklist Plug-and-play starting point Equipment Qualification

Checklist: FAT Readiness and Witnessing

A plug-and-play checklist for preparing, witnessing, and closing a Factory Acceptance Test so the trip is not wasted and the evidence is reusable: protocol approval, prerequisites, reference set, witnessing rules, data-integrity tests, and closeout, with a filled specimen.

Document type: Checklist

Read and copy the template below into your own quality system. It is a generic starting point for your own internal use, provided as is, with no warranty; see the Terms and License. Adopting it does not by itself create compliance.

This is a ready-to-use checklist for a Factory Acceptance Test, covering what to confirm before you travel, how to witness in the room, and how to close out so the evidence can be reused into qualification. Replace every <<FILL: ...>> placeholder, mark each item Pass / Fail / NA with a note, and sign it. A filled specimen follows. This is educational reference content, not regulatory advice.

FieldEntry
Checklist number<<FILL: CL-ID>>
Equipment / system<<FILL>>
Vendor / PO<<FILL>>
Planned FAT date / location<<FILL>>
Reuse intended (tests to be used in IQ/OQ)?Yes / No

Section A: Before you travel

#ItemReferencePass / Fail / NANote
A1FAT protocol reviewed and approved (owner QA approval where required)<<FILL: protocol no.>>
A2Vague acceptance criteria redlined and fixed before approval
A3Software/data-integrity tests present in protocol (access control, audit trail)
A4Vendor confirms pre-FAT / internal dry run complete, machine built to agreed software version
A5Reference set available: URS, FS, DS, P&IDs, electrical drawings, BOM, RTM<<FILL>>
A6Requirements traceability matrix identifies which tests are intended for reuse
A7Ground rules agreed: who records, who witnesses, punch numbering, classification, sign authority, fail handling
A8Photo / recording permission cleared with vendor
A9Check instruments and calibration status of vendor test gear confirmed

Section B: During execution

#ItemPass / Fail / NANote
B1Actual condition forced and observed for each step, not accepted on the vendor’s word
B2Actual results recorded contemporaneously, in ink, by the tester, initialed and dated
B3Boundaries challenged: setpoints to limits, interlocks forced, faults simulated
B4Access levels and user roles actually tested
B5Audit trail capture verified (who/what/when, cannot be disabled or edited at operator level)
B6Software version recorded (printout / screenshot)
B7Materials of construction and BOM verified against certs
B8Every observation logged as a numbered, classified punch item with an owner
B9Supporting paper verified: calibration certs, weld/material certs, pressure test records

Section C: Closeout

#ItemPass / Fail / NANote
C1Every step reconciled, no blanks, no gaps in step numbering
C2Each punch item classified and dispositioned
C3No open critical item; no open major item without approved disposition and plan
C4FAT report signed per approval matrix
C5Ship authorization issued only after C3 satisfied
C6Open items carried to SAT with documented disposition

Sign-off

RoleNameSignatureDate
Witness (C&Q engineer)<<FILL>>
Witness (QA, where required)<<FILL>>

Filled specimen

Example for a lyophilizer FAT (reuse intended: I/O check and audit-trail test into OQ).

#ItemResultNote
A1FAT protocol approved, QA signedPassRev 2, QA approved 05-Jun
A2Vague criteria redlinedPass6 steps rewritten with numeric tolerances
A3Data-integrity tests presentPassAdded access-control and audit-trail steps in redline
A4Pre-FAT complete, SW version confirmedPassVendor pre-FAT report received; SW v4.1.0
B5Audit trail capture verifiedPassForced operator setpoint change denied and logged with user + timestamp
B8Observations logged as punch itemsPass5 items raised: 1 major, 4 minor
C3No open critical / uncontrolled majorPassMajor item (wrong shelf-temp unit) fixed and retested before ship
C5Ship authorization issuedPassSigned after C3

The specimen shows the two moves that make a FAT worth the trip: the protocol was fixed before witnessing (A2, A3), and the reused tests (audit trail, I/O) were actually forced and observed, not taken on trust, so they can stand as OQ evidence later.

Common inspection findings this checklist prevents

  • Witnessing an unapproved or vague protocol, then the vendor tidies the record afterward.
  • Traveling to a FAT on a half-built machine because the pre-FAT was never confirmed.
  • Software, access-control, and audit-trail tests skipped because “we will do it in CSV later.”
  • Measurements trusted from vendor test gear of unknown calibration status.
  • Shipment authorized with an open critical item.

How to adapt this checklist

  1. Add equipment-specific test items to Sections B and C.
  2. If you intend to reuse tests, confirm A6 and witness those tests to OQ standard.
  3. Set your own critical/major/minor rules and reference them in B8.
  4. Keep the signed checklist with the FAT report and the punch list.
Use madhadi.com as an app Full screen, works offline, one tap from your home screen.