Independent and not affiliated with the FDA, MHRA, ISPE, PDA, or any agency. Get the appgoutham@madhadi.com
madhadi.comData Integrity & GxP Quality
Browse all topics → Articles Templates & Procedures Learning paths GlossaryScenariosToolsRegulatory ReferencesLearning PathsTopics About Start here
Log Plug-and-play starting point Data Integrity

Register: Data Governance Role Assignment

A plug-and-play register mapping each GxP data set to its system, owner, steward, and custodian, with acceptance status and criticality, plus field definitions and a filled specimen.

Document type: Log

Read and copy the template below into your own quality system. It is a generic starting point for your own internal use, provided as is, with no warranty; see the Terms and License. Adopting it does not by itself create compliance.

This is a ready-to-use register that maps each GxP data set to a system and to a named owner, steward, and custodian. Abstract role definitions do not survive contact with an inspector; a concrete register that answers “who owns this data” on the spot does. Keep it under change control and review it at every governance board meeting, because people move and the mapping decays in months if untended. Replace every <<FILL: ...>> placeholder. A filled specimen follows.

Control header

FieldEntry
Document titleData Governance Role Assignment Register
Document number<<FILL: DOC-ID>>
Version<<FILL: version>>
Effective date<<FILL: date>>
Owner of this register<<FILL: role, e.g. Data Integrity SME>>
Last governance board review<<FILL: date>>

Register

Data setPrimary systemCriticalityData owner (role)Data steward (role)Data custodian (role)Owner acceptance on fileSegregation confirmed
<<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL: H/M/L>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL: Y/N + date>><<FILL: Y/N>>
<<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>>
<<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>><<FILL>>

Field definitions

FieldFormatRequiredWho maintainsWhen
Data settextYesRegister ownerAt entry and on change
Primary systemtext (system / ID)YesRegister ownerAt entry
CriticalityH / M / LYesData ownerAt criticality assessment
Data ownerbusiness or quality roleYesGovernance boardAt assignment
Data stewardoperational roleYesData ownerAt assignment
Data custodianIT or vendor roleYesIT / ownerAt assignment
Owner acceptance on fileY/N + dateYesGovernance / QAAt acceptance
Segregation confirmedY/NYesQA / DI SMEAt review

Acceptance criteria for the register

  • Every GxP system in the validated system inventory appears at least once.
  • Every row has all three roles filled with a real role title, never “TBD.”
  • The owner is always a business or quality role, never “IT”; the custodian is the only column where an external vendor appears.
  • No person sits as both custodian admin and approver of their own access or data changes on the same system (segregation confirmed).
  • Owner acceptance is on file for every high-criticality data set, and the register is under change control and reviewed at governance board cadence.

Filled specimen

Data setPrimary systemCriticalityData ownerData stewardData custodianOwner acceptanceSegregation
Chromatography raw data and resultsCDS categoryHHead of QCQC systems specialistIT application adminY, 01 Jul 2026Y
Batch manufacturing recordsMES / EBRHHead of ManufacturingMES super-userIT / MES platform teamY, 28 Jun 2026Y
Stability dataLIMS + stability moduleHStability program leadLIMS data stewardIT application adminY, 25 Jun 2026Y
Deviations, CAPA, change controlQMS categoryMHead of QAQMS administrator (business)IT / SaaS vendorY, 20 Jun 2026Y
Clinical trial dataEDC / CTMSHHead of Clinical Data ManagementClinical data managerEDC vendor (hosted)Y, 30 Jun 2026Y

In this specimen every owner is a named business role, the only external parties sit in the custodian column, and each high-criticality data set has a dated owner acceptance and a confirmed segregation of duties. When the inspector asks who owns the chromatography data, the site opens this register and points to the head of QC, the steward, and the custodian, then produces the signed acceptance form.

Common inspection findings this register prevents

  • Asked who owns a data set, three people give three answers, or none can name an owner.
  • A high-criticality system has no assigned steward, so audit trail review falls to no one or to the person who created the data.
  • A hosted system’s custodian is a vendor with no owner acceptance and no segregation check recorded.
  • The register exists but is a year stale, listing leavers as owners and stewards.

How to adapt this register

  1. Seed it from your validated system inventory so every GxP system appears.
  2. Assign and ratify roles through the governance board, and record owner acceptance dates from the acceptance form.
  3. Confirm segregation of duties for each system before marking the column Y.
  4. Put the register under change control and review it at every governance board meeting.
  5. Cross-reference it with the data governance RACI so activity-level responsibilities line up with the named roles.
Use madhadi.com as an app Full screen, works offline, one tap from your home screen.